
Summary of public discussion - police officers who do not obey the law
This article is a summary of a speech presented as part of the public debate club meeting dedicated to the fight against organized crime. The club allows the presentation of positions and discussion on current issues, the club promotes the culture of discussion in Israel and is engaged in cultivating the art of speech and persuasion.to join the club – for other topics presented in the discussion – for the next public hearing (Where is the welfare state?) Mark A.Maintaining the rule of lawI want to take another part of the discussion - talk about maintaining the rule of law. To talk specifically about the police as an executive and enforcement arm of the law. Not only police problems but also the difficulties in upholding the law, and what should be the order of priorities. Care of the little citizenI listen to Razi Barkai every morning, and at least once a fortnight this problem comes up. A few days ago I heard the head of the Halston Quality Movement and the Minister of Justice agree that it is impossible to only deal with the offense and not the corruption. Prof. Friedman says that the citizen should be the first priority. The citizen is not sure that he will not be beaten tomorrow - and there have been a lot of very 'beautiful' stories recently. The citizen also knows that if a car or an apartment is broken into, nothing will help him. And so the citizen does not believe in the police who might be willing to help him? The order of priorities should also be in the fight against crime. It is true that every crime must be fought, but resources must be allocated wisely and carefully In general, the crime can be classified into 'ordinary' offenses such as property, organized crime and theft, and the second type is economic offenses and the third is corruption - public but not only. So where are the problems here? The police, we have seen in recent years, is unable to handle everything. There is no budget and resources, so it is impossible to take care of everything. So if it is not possible to take care, someone should take responsibility and determine what the situation is. I listen to Razi Barkai every morning, and at least once a fortnight this problem comes up. A few days ago I heard the head of the Halston Quality Movement and the Minister of Justice agree that it is impossible to only deal with the offense and not the corruption. Prof. Friedman says that the citizen should be the first priority. The citizen is not sure that he will not be beaten tomorrow - and there have been a lot of very 'beautiful' stories recently. The citizen also knows that if a car or an apartment is broken into, nothing will help him. And so the citizen does not believe in the police who might be willing to help him? I support Prof. Friedman's position here, that one should start by treating the citizen. Corruption is a problem, but it is more important that we be safe citizens in a safe country. 15 years ago I immigrated to Israel and I saw when I would leave the house in the middle of the night and there were a lot of people outside. Where I came from if I saw 10 people outside at night I would stay away and here I felt very safe. That experience is gone. Register now for the public discussion |
The Public Debate Club
Positions presented - the rule of law
Want to add another opening position? Previous public hearings
|